Preface and Acknowledgements |
|
xiii | |
Prelude |
|
xvii | |
|
PART I - Framework for Risk Management Using Catastrophe Models |
|
|
1 | (42) |
|
Introduction: Needs, Stakeholders, and Government Initiatives |
|
|
3 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
Private Sector Stateholders in the Management of Risk |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
State Insurance Commissioners |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Government's Role in Management of Risk |
|
|
13 | (6) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
Federal Disaster Insurance |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
An Introduction to Catastrophe Models and Insurance |
|
|
23 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
History of Catastrophe Models |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
Structure of Catastrophe Models |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Uses of a Catastrophe Model for Risk Management |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Derivation and Use of an Exceedance Probability Curve |
|
|
29 | (5) |
|
Generating an Exceedance Probability Curve |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
Stakeholders and the Exceedance Probability Curve |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Insurability of Catastrophe Risks |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
Conditions for Insurability of a Risk |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Determining Whether to Provide Coverage |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Framework to Integrate Risk Assessment with Risk Management |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Summary and Relationship to Parts II-IV |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
PART II -- Natural Hazard Risk Assessment |
|
|
43 | (50) |
|
The Risk Assessment Process: The Role of Catastrophe Modeling in Dealing with Natural Hazards |
|
|
45 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
|
47 | (11) |
|
Locations of Potential Future Events |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
Parameterizing Severity at the Hazard's Source |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Parameters for Local Intensity and Site Effects |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (5) |
|
Identification of Typical Buildings |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Building Performance |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
Sources, Nature, and Impact of Uncertainties on Catastrophe Modeling |
|
|
69 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Classifications of Uncertainty |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (4) |
|
Representing and Quantifying Uncertainty |
|
|
74 | (5) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
Uncertainty and the Exceedance Probability Curve |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Case Studies in Uncertainty |
|
|
79 | (10) |
|
Hurricane Hazard: Florida |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
Earthquake Hazard: Charleston, South Carolina |
|
|
82 | (7) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
PART III -- Linking Risk Assessment With Insurance |
|
|
93 | (72) |
|
Use of Catastrophe Models in Insurance Rate Making |
|
|
97 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
Use of Catastrophe Models in Rate Making |
|
|
100 | (6) |
|
A Simple Rate Making Model |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
Regulation and Catastrophe Modeling |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
Case Study of Rate-Setting: California Earthquake Authority |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (6) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Open Issues for Using Catastrophe Models to Determine Rates |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Insurance Portfolio Management |
|
|
119 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Portfolio Composition and Catastrophe Modeling |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Catastrophe Modeling -- Bottom-up Approach |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Portfolio Management Example |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Underwriting and Risk Selection |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Special Issues Regarding Portfolio Risk |
|
|
127 | (5) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
|
135 | (30) |
|
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
What Risks Should Be Financed? |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Probable Maximum Loss (PML) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Risk Financing Mechanisms |
|
|
139 | (19) |
|
Generating Funds Internally |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
Risk Transfer -- Reinsurance |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
Risk Transfer -- Securitization |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Securitization Structures |
|
|
145 | (11) |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
The Costs of Risk Transfer |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Risk Financing Schemes |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
Analyze Current Risk Profile |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Establish Performance Measures, Constraints, Critical Function |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Develop Risk Management Alternatives |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Evaluate Alternative Strategies |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Select, Implement, and Monitor Strategy |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
PART IV -- Risk Management Strategies Using Catastrophe Models |
|
|
165 | (70) |
|
The Impact of Mitigation on Homeowners and Insurers: An Analysis of Model Cities |
|
|
167 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
Construction of Model Cities |
|
|
171 | (4) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Books of Business for the Insurance Companies |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
Insurance Company Premium and Asset Levels |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Incorporating Uncertainty Into Analysis |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Insurer Decision Processes |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
Impact of Mitigation on Losses and Insurer Behavior |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
Homeowner Decision Processes |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
Factors Influencing Mitigation Adoption Decisions |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
The Interaction of Mitigation Decisions and Insurance Decisions |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Implications for Workable Public-Private Partnerships |
|
|
181 | (5) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Long-Term Mitigation Loans |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Lower Deductibles Tied to Mitigation |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
The Impact of Risk Transfer Instruments: An Analysis of Model Cities |
|
|
189 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Framework for Evaluating Alternative Strategies |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
Evaluating Different Strategies for the Insurer |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
Impact of Indemnity Contracts on Insurer Performance |
|
|
193 | (4) |
|
Excess-of-Loss Reinsurance Using Strategy 1 |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
Comparison of Performance Across Insurer's Strategies |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Catastrophe Bonds As Additional Sources of Funding |
|
|
197 | (8) |
|
Structure of Catastrophe Bond for Oakland |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
Impact on Insurer's Performance in Oakland |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
Performance of Catastrophe Bonds Across Different Regions |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Multi-Region Catastrophe Bonds |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Extensions of the Analysis |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (2) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
Extending Catastrophe Modeling To Terrorism |
|
|
209 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
September 11, 2001: Impacts on Terrorism Insurance |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
The Nature of Terrorism Coverage |
|
|
211 | (4) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Expanding Capacity Through Catastrophe Bonds |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Potential Role of Catastrophe Bonds |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Comparison of Terrorism Risk with Natural Disaster Risk |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
Public-Private Risk Sharing Under TRIA |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
Challenge for Insurers and Firms: Quantifying the Residual Risk |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
Catastrophe Models for Terrorism Risk |
|
|
218 | (9) |
|
|
219 | (3) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
Workers' Compensation Loss |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
The ISO Advisory Loss Costs |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Low Insurance Demand for Terrorism Coverage |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
Future Research Directions |
|
|
229 | (3) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
|
232 | (3) |
Glossary |
|
235 | (6) |
Index |
|
241 | |