Preface |
|
ix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
I. INTRODUCTION |
|
|
Structural Equation Models: The Basics |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
|
4 | (4) |
|
|
8 | (7) |
|
|
15 | (42) |
|
Working With AMOS Graphics: Example 1 |
|
|
16 | (15) |
|
Working With AMOS Basic: Example 1 |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
AMOS Graphics and AMOS Basic: A Comparison |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
The Concept of Model Identification |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
Working With AMOS Graphics: Example 2 |
|
|
36 | (6) |
|
Working With AMOS Basic: Example 2 |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Working With AMOS Graphics: Example 3 |
|
|
44 | (8) |
|
Working With AMOS Basic: Example 3 |
|
|
52 | (5) |
II: SINGLE-GROUP ANALYSES |
|
|
Application 1: Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Theoretical Construct (First-Order CFA Model) |
|
|
57 | (41) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Hypothesis 1: Self-Concept Is a Four-Factor Structure |
|
|
58 | (5) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Modeling With AMOS: Graphics and Basic |
|
|
70 | (21) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
Hypothesis 2: Self-Concept Is a Two-factor Structure |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
Hypothesis 3: Self-Concept Is a One-factor Structure |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Application 2: Testing for the Factorial Validity of Scores From a Measuring Instrument (First-Order CFA Model) |
|
|
98 | (22) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
|
107 | (11) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
Application 3: Testing for the Factorial Validity of Scores From a Measuring Instrument (Second-Order CFA Model) |
|
|
120 | (22) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
121 | (14) |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
Application 4: Testing for the Validity of a Causal Structure |
|
|
142 | (31) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
144 | (10) |
|
|
154 | (15) |
|
|
169 | (4) |
III. MULTIPLE-GROUP ANALYSES |
|
|
Application 5: Testing for Invariant Factorial Structure of a Measuring Instrument (First-Order CFA Model) |
|
|
173 | (27) |
|
Testing for Multigroup Invariance |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
Testing for Invariance Across Teaching Panels |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
177 | (20) |
|
|
197 | (3) |
|
Application 6: Testing for Invariant Factorial Structure of a Theoretical Construct (First-Order CFA Model) |
|
|
200 | (26) |
|
Testing for Invariance Across Gender |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
202 | (21) |
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
Application 7: Testing for Invariant Latent Mean Structures |
|
|
226 | (21) |
|
Basic Concepts Underlying Tests of Latent Mean Structures |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
Testing for Latent Mean Differences |
|
|
231 | (12) |
|
|
243 | (4) |
|
Application 8: Testing for Invariant Pattern of Causal Structure |
|
|
247 | (20) |
|
Cross-Validation in Covariance Structure Modeling |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
Testing for Invariance Across Calibration/Validation Samples |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
250 | (12) |
|
|
262 | (5) |
IV: OTHER IMPORTANT TOPICS |
|
|
Application 9: Bootstrapping as an Aid to Nonnormal Data |
|
|
267 | (20) |
|
Basic Principles Underlying the Bootstrap Procedure |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
271 | (14) |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
Application 10: Dealing With Incomplete Data |
|
|
287 | (18) |
|
Basic Patterns of Incomplete Data |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
Common Approaches to Handling Incomplete Data |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
The AMOS Approach to Handling Incomplete Data |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
Modeling With AMOS Graphics |
|
|
293 | (4) |
|
|
297 | (8) |
References |
|
305 | (9) |
Appendix A |
|
314 | (1) |
Appendix B |
|
315 | (1) |
Appendix C |
|
316 | (1) |
Appendix D |
|
317 | (2) |
Appendix E |
|
319 | (3) |
Appendix F |
|
322 | (1) |
Appendix G |
|
323 | (1) |
Appendix H |
|
324 | (3) |
Appendix I |
|
327 | (1) |
Appendix J |
|
328 | (1) |
Author Index |
|
329 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
333 | |