| Preface |
|
ix | (2) |
| Frequently Cited Sources |
|
xi | |
|
1 Justification Defenses: The Issues |
|
|
1 | (15) |
|
1.1 The Theoretical Debate about the General Category of Justification Defenses |
|
|
2 | (9) |
|
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
1.1.2 Justified Conduct as Right or as Permissible |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.1.3 Unknowingly Justified Defendants |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.1.4 Putative Justification |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.1.5 The Social Matrix and the Incompatibility Thesis |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
1.1.6 Duress as a Problematic Classification |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.2 Self-defense as a Problematic Specific Justification Defense |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
1.2.1 General Self-defense |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Battered Women and Self-defense |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.3 Necessity, Nullification, and Crimes of Conscience |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
2 Justification Defenses and the Conventional Public Morality |
|
|
16 | (39) |
|
|
|
16 | (5) |
|
2.2 Knowledge and Justification |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.3 Moral Condemnation and Criminal Punishment |
|
|
22 | (7) |
|
2.3.1 Five Types of Condemnation in Criminal Punishment |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
2.3.2 Hard Cases for Moral Condemnation |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Moral Condemnation and Justification Defenses |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
2.4 Knowledge and Justification Revisited |
|
|
29 | (11) |
|
2.4.1 Moral Condemnation, Prohibitory Norms, and Unknowingly Justified Defendants |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.4.2 Justification Defenses with Subjective Elements |
|
|
31 | (6) |
|
2.4.3 Hard Cases and the Knowledge Requirement |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
2.5 The Social Matrix and the Incompatibility Thesis |
|
|
40 | (12) |
|
2.5.1 Assisting Justified Acts |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
2.5.2 The Duty Not to Interfere and the Incompatibility Thesis |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
2.5.3 Hard Cases and the Revised Matrix of Social Responsibility |
|
|
47 | (5) |
|
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
|
55 | (34) |
|
3.1 Contemporary Theories |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
3.1.1 Self-defense and the Social Order |
|
|
56 | (4) |
|
3.1.2 Self-defense and Distributive Justice |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
3.2 Legal Defenses and Individual Interests |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
3.3 The Normative Structure |
|
|
64 | (11) |
|
3.3.1 Political Liberalism |
|
|
65 | (6) |
|
3.3.2 The Criminal Justice System in the Liberal Society |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
3.3.3 Justification Defenses |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
3.4 Self-defense as Justified Conduct in a Liberal Society |
|
|
75 | (8) |
|
3.5 Self-defense as Morally Justifiable Law |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
4 Self-defense and Battered Women |
|
|
89 | (47) |
|
4.1 Self-defense Doctrine |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
4.2 The Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-defense |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
4.2.1 The Battered Woman Syndrome |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 The Putative Relevance of the Battered Woman Syndrome to Self-defense |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.3 Battered Woman Syndrome Research |
|
|
94 | (20) |
|
4.4 The Battered Woman Syndrome and Conventional Self-defense Law |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
4.4.1 Imminence or Immediacy |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Imminent or Immediately Necessary: The Justificatory Foundation |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
4.4.3 Learned Helplessness as Disordered Thought and Special Capacity |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
4.4.4 Necessary Force: Battered Woman Syndrome or the Pattern of Battering |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
4.4.5 Reasonable Belief in the Necessity of Deadly Force |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
4.4.6 Retreat as a Legal Alternative to Defensive Force |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
4.4.7 Institutional Legal Alternatives |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
4.4.8 The Pattern of Battering as Support for Reasonable Belief |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
4.4.9 Credibility and the Failure to Leave Previously |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
4.5 Self-defense by Battered Women as Justification and Excuse |
|
|
114 | (20) |
|
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
4.5.2 Battered Woman Syndrome and Mental Illness |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
4.5.3 Reasonable Belief: Justification and Excuse |
|
|
120 | (6) |
|
4.5.4 Culpability and Battered Women as Justified or Excused |
|
|
126 | (8) |
|
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
5 Duress and Systemically Complete Mitigation |
|
|
136 | (17) |
|
5.1 The Theoretical Interpretation |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
5.2 Systemically Complete Mitigation |
|
|
142 | (4) |
|
5.3 Two Potential Criticisms |
|
|
146 | (5) |
|
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
6 The Limits of Justification: Necessity and Nullification |
|
|
153 | (46) |
|
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
|
|
156 | (11) |
|
6.2.1 The Central Explicit Debate |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
157 | (6) |
|
6.2.3 Deception and the Moral Force of the Criminal Law |
|
|
163 | (4) |
|
6.3 Necessity and Nullification in a Liberal Society |
|
|
167 | (20) |
|
6.3.1 Deception and the Integrity of a Liberal Criminal Justice System |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Necessity and Nullification: The Conceptual Puzzle |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
|
|
170 | (7) |
|
6.3.4 Nullification as Necessity: Intrasystemic Appeals to Justice |
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
6.3.5 Nullification beyond Necessity: Intrasystemic Appeals to Mercy |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
6.3.6 Nullification beyond Necessity: Extrasystemic Nullification |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
6.4 The Responsibilities of Persons in a Liberal Society |
|
|
187 | (11) |
|
6.4.1 The Zenger Trial and Jurors as Persons |
|
|
187 | (6) |
|
6.4.2 Judicial Nullification |
|
|
193 | (4) |
|
6.4.3 Conflicting Obligations: Tension Rather than Contradiction |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
|
199 | (6) |
| Index |
|
205 | |