The English revolution is one of the most intensely-debated events in history; parallel events in Scotland have never attracted the same degree of interest. Rethinking the Scottish Revolution argues for a new interpretation of the seventeenth-century Scottish revolution that goes beyond questions about its radicalism, and reconsiders its place within an overarching 'British' narrative.

Laura Stewart analyses how interactions between print and manuscript polemic, crowds, and political performances enabled protestors against a Prayer Book to destroy Charles I's Scottish government. Particular attention is given to the way in which debate in Scotland was affected by the emergence of London as a major publishing centre. The subscription of the 1638 National Covenant occurred within this context and further politicized subordinate social groups that included women. Unlike in England, however, public debate was contained. A remodelled constitution revivified the institutions of civil and ecclesiastical governance, enabling Covenanted Scotland to pursue interventionist policies in Ireland and England - albeit at terrible cost to the Scottish people.

War transformed the nature of state power in Scotland, but this achievement was contentious and fragile. A key weakness lay in the separation of ecclesiastical and civil authority, which justified for some a strictly conditional understanding of obedience to temporal authority. Rethinking the Scottish Revolution explores challenges to legitimacy of the Covenanted constitution, but qualifies the idea that Scotland was set on a course to destruction as a result. Covenanted government was overthrown by the new model army in 1651, but its ideals persisted. In Scotland as well as England, the language of liberty, true religion, and the public interest had justified resistance to Charles I. The Scottish revolution embedded a distinctive and durable political culture that ultimately proved resistant to assimilation into the nascent British state.

Laura A. M. Stewart, Senior Lecturer in Early Modern British History, Birkbeck, University of London

Laura A.M. Stewart is Professor of early modern British history, University of York. After completing her PhD at Edinburgh University (2003), she was awarded a British Academy Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (2005), before taking up a lectureship at Birkbeck, University of London. Her first book, Urban Politics and the British Civil Wars: Edinburgh, 1617-53 was published in 2006. She has written many articles on Scottish and Anglo-Scottish history, and led a special edition of the Journal of British Studies on the theme of 'Publics and Participation in early modern Britain (Oct. 2016). A textbook on early modern Scotland, Union, Revolution and Empire, co-authored with Dr Janay Nugent, will be published by Edinburgh University Press for the New History of Scotland series in 2019. Rethinking the Scottish Revolution was nominated for the 2017 Longman-History Today prize and won the American Historical Association Morris D. Forkosch prize in 2017.

Introduction
Part I: The Making of Covenanted Scotland
1. People, Politics, and Publics: the Scottish Crisis, 1637-41
2. Politics in the Parishes: the National Covenant
3. The Covenanted Commonwealth: History, People, and Nation
Part II: Authority and Governance in Covenanted Scotland
4. The Formation of the Covenanted State
5. Authority and Governance in Covenanted Scotland
6. Print, Petitioning, and Public Debate: the Engagement Crisis of 1648
Conclusion