|
1 Soft Sensors in Industrial Applications |
|
|
1 | |
|
|
1 | |
|
|
4 | |
|
1.2.1 Data Collection and Filtering |
|
|
5 | |
|
1.2.2 Variables and Model Structure Selection |
|
|
6 | |
|
1.2.3 Model Identification |
|
|
9 | |
|
|
10 | |
|
|
10 | |
|
2 Virtual Instruments and Soft Sensors |
|
|
15 | |
|
|
15 | |
|
2.2 Applications of Soft Sensors |
|
|
22 | |
|
2.2.1 Back-up of Measuring Devices |
|
|
22 | |
|
2.2.2 Reducing the Measuring Hardware Requirements |
|
|
23 | |
|
2.2.3 Real-time Estimation for Monitoring and Control |
|
|
24 | |
|
2.2.4 Sensor Validation, Fault Detection and Diagnosis |
|
|
24 | |
|
|
25 | |
|
|
27 | |
|
|
27 | |
|
3.2 The Identification Procedure |
|
|
27 | |
|
3.3 Data Selection and Filtering |
|
|
30 | |
|
3.4 Model Structures and Regressor Selection |
|
|
34 | |
|
|
46 | |
|
4 Selecting Data from Plant Database |
|
|
53 | |
|
4.1 Detection of Outliers for a Debutanizer Column: A Comparison of Different Approaches |
|
|
53 | |
|
|
54 | |
|
4.1.2 Jolliffe Parameters with Principal Component Analysis |
|
|
66 | |
|
4.1.3 Jolliffe Parameters with Projection to Latent Structures |
|
|
68 | |
|
4.1.4 Residual Analysis of Linear Regression |
|
|
71 | |
|
4.2 Comparison of Methods for Outlier Detection |
|
|
72 | |
|
|
80 | |
|
5 Choice of the Model Structure |
|
|
81 | |
|
|
81 | |
|
5.2 Static Models for the Prediction of NOx Emissions for a Refinery |
|
|
82 | |
|
5.3 Linear Dynamic Models for RON Value Estimation in Powerformed Gasoline |
|
|
87 | |
|
5.4 Soft Computing Identification Strategies for a Sulfur Recovery Unit |
|
|
90 | |
|
5.5 Comparing Different Methods for Inputs and Regressor Selection for a Debutanizer Column |
|
|
97 | |
|
5.5.1 Simple Correlation Method |
|
|
98 | |
|
5.5.2 Partial Correlation Method |
|
|
100 | |
|
5.5.3 Mallow's Coefficients with a Linear Model |
|
|
101 | |
|
5.5.4 Mallow's Coefficients with a Neural Model |
|
|
102 | |
|
|
103 | |
|
|
108 | |
|
|
114 | |
|
|
115 | |
|
|
115 | |
|
6.2 The Debutanizer Column |
|
|
116 | |
|
6.3 The Cascaded Structure for the Soft Sensor |
|
|
117 | |
|
6.4 The One-step-ahead Predictor Soft Sensor |
|
|
127 | |
|
6.4.1 Refinement of the One-step-ahead Soft Sensor |
|
|
134 | |
|
|
142 | |
|
7 Strategies to Improve Soft Sensor Performance |
|
|
143 | |
|
|
143 | |
|
7.2 Stacked Neural Network Approach for a Sulfur Recovery Unit |
|
|
144 | |
|
7.3 Model Aggregation Using Fuzzy Logic for the Estimation of RON in Powerformed Gasoline |
|
|
158 | |
|
|
164 | |
|
8 Adapting Soft Sensors to Applications |
|
|
167 | |
|
|
167 | |
|
8.2 A Virtual Instrument for the What-if Analysis of a Sulfur Recovery Unit |
|
|
167 | |
|
8.3 Estimation of Pollutants in a Large Geographical Area |
|
|
174 | |
|
|
181 | |
|
9 Fault Detection, Sensor Validation and Diagnosis |
|
|
183 | |
|
9.1 Historical Background |
|
|
183 | |
|
9.2 An Overview of Fault Detection and Diagnosis |
|
|
184 | |
|
9.3 Model-based Fault Detection |
|
|
187 | |
|
|
188 | |
|
9.3.2 Fault Detection Approaches |
|
|
189 | |
|
9.3.3 Improved Model-based Fault Detection Schemes |
|
|
197 | |
|
9.4 Symptom Analysis and Fault Diagnosis |
|
|
199 | |
|
9.5 Trends in Industrial Applications |
|
|
201 | |
|
9.6 Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Hierarchical View |
|
|
202 | |
|
9.7 Sensor Validation and Soft Sensors |
|
|
203 | |
|
9.8 Hybrid Approaches to Industrial Fault Detection, Diagnosis and Sensor Validation |
|
|
204 | |
|
9.9 Validation of Mechanical Stress Measurements in the JET TOKAMAK |
|
|
207 | |
|
9.9.1 Heuristic Knowledge |
|
|
208 | |
|
9.9.2 Exploiting Partial Physical Redundancy |
|
|
209 | |
|
9.9.3 A Hybrid Approach to Fault Detection and Classification of Mechanical Stresses |
|
|
211 | |
|
9.10 Validation of Plasma Density Measurement at ENEA-FTU |
|
|
217 | |
|
9.10.1 Knowledge Acquisition |
|
|
218 | |
|
9.10.2 Symptom Definition |
|
|
219 | |
|
9.10.3 Design of the Detection Tool: Soft Sensor and Fuzzy Model Validator |
|
|
219 | |
|
9.10.4 The Main Fuzzy Validator |
|
|
221 | |
|
9.10.5 Performance Assessment |
|
|
222 | |
|
9.11 Basic Terminology in Fault Detection and Diagnosis |
|
|
223 | |
|
|
225 | |
Appendix A Description of the Plants |
|
227 | |
|
|
227 | |
|
A.2 Chimneys of a Refinery |
|
|
227 | |
|
|
229 | |
|
|
232 | |
|
|
233 | |
|
A.6 Nuclear Fusion Process: Working Principles of Tokamaks |
|
|
235 | |
|
|
235 | |
|
A.6.2 Tokamak Working Principles |
|
|
238 | |
|
A.7 Machine Diagnostic System at JET and the Monitoring of Mechanical Stresses Under Plasma Disruptions |
|
|
241 | |
|
A.7.1 The MDS Measurement System |
|
|
241 | |
|
A.7.2 Disruptions and Mechanical Stresses |
|
|
242 | |
|
A.8 Interferometry-based Measurement System for Plasma Density at FTU |
|
|
243 | |
Appendix B Structured References |
|
245 | |
|
B.1 Theoretical Contributions |
|
|
245 | |
|
|
245 | |
|
B.1.2 Data Collection and Filtering, Effect of Missing Data |
|
|
246 | |
|
B.1.3 Variables and Model Structure Selection |
|
|
247 | |
|
B.1.4 Model Identification |
|
|
248 | |
|
|
249 | |
|
B.1.6 Fault Detection and Diagnosis, Sensor Validation |
|
|
250 | |
|
B.2 Applicative Contributions |
|
|
252 | |
References |
|
257 | |
Index |
|
267 | |